
The ever-growing use of technology within primary classroom settings is inevitable in our modern-day society and while digital resources can be used effectively it also has the potential to limit opportunities for students to actively engage in working mathematically and focus on learning with overbearing stimulants and distractions. Research has shown excessive or unrefined use of ICT can negatively impact mathematical learning through distractions and time wasting. it has been proven that technology often encourages speed and getting the answer over reasoning and process reducing engagement in and development of essential working-out strategies. This contradicts the NESA syllabus’ stressed importance of working mathematically as students skip necessary steps with the goal being the answer. Online math tools such as Mathletics provide students with instant feedback stating if the students answer was correct or incorrect, they also provide working out tools and methods of finding an answer however students rarely utilise these tools preferring to just complete the work as fast as possible. This shift away from procedural fluency and conceptual understanding has significant repercussions on the value and effectiveness of mathematics learning by limiting the depth of students knowledge. Technology has also been proven to drastically reduce attention span which is likely the cause of students disinterest in true learning and deeper understanding when using ICT. Often in classrooms when using technology in a lesson if students finish early the teacher will allow them to do some other tasks still using technology, which appeals as a reward and incentive to move quickly through work. Technology should be purposeful and strategically integrated into learning practices rather than a convenience. Students, particularly those in primary school, should engage in manual working-out and reasoning when completing mathematical problems and should turn to digital tools only when checking their work or extending their understanding. This ensures that technology is a supportive device rather than it continually replacing cognitive processes.
Kaeley Pitt







