The tutor starts by asking the student what they actually care about. No preamble, no context-setting — just a direct question. From there she runs a brainstorm, not a polished one, but a messy back and forth where she is visibly filtering through what the student offers, looking for something usable. She is working out what the student has to write with before they have worked it out themselves.
She tests a few directions. Some get dropped quickly. When something has potential she stops and presses on it — asking the student to say more, to go further back, to be more specific. She is looking for the story underneath the story, the detail that carries genuine feeling rather than the one the student thinks they are supposed to write about.
Tips come in as she goes. She explains how to ground a scene in the senses, how to let a moment breathe rather than over-explain it, how to trust that a specific detail does more work than a general statement. She is not running through a checklist. She raises each point because something the student has said has made it relevant right now.
The vignette work is hands on. The tutor suggests a setting, the student responds, and together they figure out what version of it is worth building. She is showing the student how to construct a scene from the inside out — starting with one concrete image and expanding from there.
The discussion throughout is direct. The tutor says plainly what is working and what is not. The student pushes back occasionally and the tutor either adjusts or holds her ground and explains why. It is a functional working relationship rather than a performance of encouragement.
